Field Trip as an Interdisciplinary Learning Laboratory
Field Trip as an Interdisciplinary Learning Laboratory
Abstract
Field trips are often viewed as supplementary activities meant for observation and recreation. However, when designed thoughtfully, they can transform into powerful interdisciplinary learning laboratories. This article documents a field trip experience where natural rock surfaces exhibiting biological weathering became a live platform to integrate Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Environmental Studies. The approach emphasized Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), student-driven inquiry, experimentation, data collection, documentation, and research extension. The article also evaluates the effectiveness of this teaching–learning strategy, highlighting its strengths and limitations.
1. Introduction: From Observation to Investigation
During the field trip, students observed whitish crust-like growth on rock surfaces. Instead of providing ready-made explanations, the learning process was intentionally shifted from "telling" to "questioning". This natural phenomenon became a trigger to:
Stimulate curiosity
Encourage interdisciplinary thinking
Promote scientific inquiry
Develop research and documentation skills
The field itself became the classroom, and nature became the textbook.
2. Generating Higher Order Thinking Questions (HOTS)
Students were guided to move beyond simple observation-based questions (LOTs) to analytical and evaluative questions (HOTS).
Examples of HOTS generated by students:
Why is this growth present only on certain rock surfaces?
Is this purely a biological phenomenon or a chemical process?
How does this growth affect rock stability over long periods?
Can microscopic organisms influence geological changes?
Does this process have environmental or climatic implications?
This questioning strategy encouraged analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and hypothesis formation, which are core elements of higher-order thinking.
3. Interdisciplinary Concept Integration
The same observation was connected to multiple subjects, helping students realize that knowledge is not compartmentalized.
Biology
Lichens and microbial biofilms
Symbiotic relationships (fungi + algae + bacteria)
Survival strategies of organisms in extreme habitats
Chemistry
Organic acid secretion (oxalic acid, carbonic acid)
Acid–mineral reactions
pH variation and chemical weathering
Earth Science / Geology
Biological weathering of rocks
Soil formation processes
Rock–microbe interactions
Environmental Studies
Role of microorganisms in ecosystem balance
Natural recycling of minerals
Long-term landscape evolution
Through this integration, students understood that a single natural event can be explained through multiple scientific lenses.
4. Extending Learning into Research Mode
4.1 Information Gathering
Students were encouraged to:
Collect field photographs
Record location, surface type, moisture conditions
Refer textbooks, journals, and credible online resources
4.2 Experimentation
Simple experiments were designed using accessible materials:
pH testing to detect acid secretion
Carbonate reaction tests using chalk/limestone
Observation of surface softening or mass loss
These experiments converted abstract concepts into measurable evidence.
4.3 Data Collection
Students maintained:
Observation tables
pH readings
Time-based changes
Comparative samples (with and without growth)
This introduced students to scientific data discipline.
5. Documentation of the Field Trip and Research
Students were guided to prepare a structured document, similar to a mini research report.
Suggested Documentation Format:
Title of the study
Aim and objectives
Field observations (with photographs)
Hypothesis
Materials and methods
Observations and data tables
Results and inference
Interdisciplinary connections
Environmental significance
Conclusion and future scope
This practice helped students develop scientific writing, logical sequencing, and evidence-based reasoning.
6. Effectiveness of This Teaching–Learning Strategy
Educational Effectiveness
Promotes conceptual clarity
Encourages inquiry-based learning
Strengthens long-term retention
Develops research mindset
Learning Efficiency
Multiple subjects taught through a single experience
Reduced rote memorization
High student engagement
Better utilization of real-world contexts
Students shifted from passive learners to active investigators.
7. Pros and Cons of Field-Based Interdisciplinary Learning
Advantages (Pros)
Real-life contextual learning
Encourages curiosity and creativity
Develops scientific temper
Builds teamwork and communication skills
Bridges theory and practice
Limitations (Cons)
Requires careful planning and time
Assessment is more complex
Safety and logistical constraints
Not all syllabus topics can be covered this way
However, these limitations can be managed through proper planning and structured follow-up activities.
8. Conclusion
This field trip demonstrated that nature itself is a powerful interdisciplinary classroom. By encouraging observation, questioning, experimentation, and documentation, students experienced how biology, chemistry, earth science, and environmental studies are deeply interconnected. Such teaching strategies nurture scientific thinking, innovation, and lifelong learning skills, making education both meaningful and transformative.
9. Educational Insight
“When students learn to ask questions from nature, textbooks become references—not boundaries.”
This approach aligns with modern educational goals of experiential learning, NEP vision, and future-ready education.
Prepared with the intent of empowering teachers to transform field trips into research-driven interdisciplinary learning experiences.
Comments
Post a Comment